Evidence

ROME INCIDENT

Apr 13th, 1994

More Mythology in Rome?

In another article, published by Rolling Stone Magazine in June of 1994 by the well-known author Neil Strauss, there also appears to be some glaring misconceptions with regard to not only the evening of March 18th – but of Cobain’s accidental overdose in Rome on March 4th, just two weeks before the March 18th police call. The article characterized that Cobain’s overdose in Rome, was a “failed suicide attempt, however, this media analysis differed quite a bit from Dr. Osvaldo Galleta, the attending doctor who treated Cobain:

and Love told police she feared a suicide.

Police found three pistols, a rifle and 25 boxes of ammunition, but Cobain denied he was suicidal and told officers he had locked himself in the room after an argument with Love. Police confiscated the weapons, but took no other action.

He initially stayed in Seattle, the Times said, but gave in and on March 28, checked into a recovery program at Marina del Rey, Calif.

Love went to Los Angeles on March 25 to prepare for the release of a new album by her band, Hole. She urged Cobain to come with her and check into a recovery program.







In March 2014, the Seattle Police Department developed four rolls of film that had been left in an evidence vault. According to the Seattle police, the photographs depict the scene of Cobain’s corpse more clearly than previous Polaroid images taken by the police. Detective Mike Cieszynski, a cold case investigator, was asked to look at the film because “it is 20 years later and it’s a high media case”. Cieszynski stated that the official cause of Cobain’s death remains suicide and that the images would not be released to the public, but in 2016, the images were released. According to a spokesperson for the Seattle police, the department receives at least one request weekly, mostly through Twitter, to reopen the investigation. This resulted in the maintenance of the basic incident report on file.



DET. MIKE CIESYNSKI

DET. MIKE CIESZYNSKI

I had no involvement in the original investigation aside from taking a taped statement two years after Cobain’s death. I also knew that a couple of rolls of 35 mm film, backup evidence photos from the death scene, were never processed. So, I ordered up the case file from our records vault, closed my private office door, and read the entire file for the first time One of the original case detectives,

Steve Kirkland, had passed away, as did the scene sergeant Don Cameron. Steve and his partner Jim Yoshida were the best homicide detectives in the unit. Jim was retired, so I gave him a call and told him what I was up to. Jim told me that Courtney Love was very cooperative throughout the investigation and that they had spent a lot of time on the case. I asked Jim who had made the decision not to develop all of the film. He said it was Cameron’s call to not develop the film and to have it placed in the records room safe along with the case file so that no one would swipe anything. Obviously, the media attention was making a few folks a little paranoid

. Dr. Nikolas Hartshome was the assistant medical examiner who conducted the autopsy. Nick was a great guy who passed away in 2002. When I received the autopsy report I remembered leaning back in my chair and giving a “whoa” after seeing the morphine level Kurt had in his system. It also showed track marks, and there were several grams of black tar heroin left in his kit. Black tar heroin is found on the west coast west of the Mississippi as compared to Brown or white heroin found on the eastern part of the U.S. I knew I had to develop the film. The supervisor of the crime lab grimaced when I explained it was 20 years old. Film becomes deteriorates with each passing year and becomes very brittle — something I know from working old cold cases — and I wasn’t about to let the film get anymore fouled on my watch. We would have to take the film to the sheriff’s photo unit since Seattle Police Department stopped developing 35mm film since transitioning to digital. Once developed, it was obvious the film had deteriorated, leaving a green tint to all of the photos. The note recovered from the scene was examined by a Washington State Patrol Forensic Document Examiner who concluded the note was written by Cobain.




In this interview Dr. Wecht talks about different aspects of his expertise and renders his opinion on the death of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain.

(1) Why do you believe that Mr Cobain’s death was a homicide staged as a suicide? 

I have never seen a case of someone with such an exceptionally high level of heroin, enough to kill a lot of people, who were able to do what the authorities say Kurt Cobain did. It does not make any sense at all from a physiological, neurological or psychological standpoint. Num

(2) Are you aware of any recorded cases of deceased persons with the blood morphine level comparable to Mr. Cobain’s?

Not frequently, but I have dealt with several over the years. In fact, I will be testifying in one in the next couple of weeks in Philadelphia. So, while they are not frequent, they do occur. It is just not something that you would never see. I have dealt with a couple dozen over the years in which I rendered reports and testified. Could you walk us through the proper procedure of determining the cause and manner of death, the role of the police department and the medical examiner in the process, as well as the sequence and timeline for the process? The procedures are very straightforward. Homicide detectives are called to the scene, not just plain regular cops.

(3) You have also expressed some doubts about the position of the shotgun on Mr. Cobain’s body.

Yes. The position of the shotgun did not fit either with someone having shot himself with a shotgun. That was very important too. When you go to a scene and you have someone who has been found shot you have to be very careful. This leads me to another big point which is that the scene was not at all properly investigated. They made a quick assumption of a very premature nature that it was a suicide. You do not do that. You treat every case as if it were homicide and most of the time it will prove to be a suicide or maybe an accident. The percentage of homicides will below, but you make sure that you treat it as one. You collect everything that you can: footprints, fingerprints, trace evidence, physical evidence, hair, and so on. And then if it all proves to be unnecessary, the only thing is that you have spent some time, some energy. But this was not done, and the scene was not properly investigated.

(4) In your practice how often have you come across staged suicides?

(5) You walked us through the proper procedure and now how was this procedure not followed in Mr. Cobain’s case?

(6) What can be done to have this case reinvestigated now?

The legal next of kin would have to become very active in pushing for this. There isn’t any process available to have this case reinvestigated by another agency? No, it would have to come from law enforcement. There is no statute of limitations on homicide, so from a legal standpoint you could revisit, but it would have to emanate from the district attorney or a law enforcement agency. Dr. Nikolas Hartshorne signed Kurt Cobain’s death certificate calling his death a suicide one day after the body was discovered. This was despite the fact that the full toxicology results would not be available for weeks. Hartshorne was employed by the King County Medical Examiner’s Office on a fellowship. He had not yet taken the accreditation examination necessary to become a certified examiner. Hartshorne died in 2002 in a BASE-jumping accident. Autopsy reports are not a matter of public record in Washington State, where Mr. Cobain died. Only the next of kin can request their copies. If you had access to Mr. Cobain’s autopsy report either because it was forwarded to you by his family or you found yourself in its possession in some other manner, would you be willing to examine it and render a professional opinion? read the full interview below

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=8&ved=2ahUKEwidjO_gqt_oAhXnSRUIHXPEA0oQFjAHegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.smobserved.com%2Fstory%2F2020%2F02%2F12%2Fnews%2Fkurt-cobains-death-a-murder-not-pursued-by-authorities-believes-renowned-forensic-pathologist%2F4430.html%3Fm%3Dtrue&usg=AOvVaw1iA1TFN8pBjm4WCOakxbC8



FORMER POLICE CHIEF NORM STAMPER

The movie addressed the undeveloped film and reenacts a scene in which Grant is told the photos will probably never be developed because they “don’t develop photos on suicides.” “Soaked In Bleach” goes on to claim that “by their negligent death investigation,” the Seattle Police:

Allowed Kurt Cobain to be cremated 6 days after being discovered. Waited 30 days to process the shotgun for fingerprints. Gave Courtney Love the shotgun to have it melted down. Allowed the greenhouse crime scene to be torn down and destroyed

(read more in the blog link below)

http://cobainevidenceblog.blogspot.cz/2016/05/washington-state-patrol-declined-to.html





, Tom Grant (PI hired by Courtney to find Kurt in his missing days) asked for his credit card transaction log. After looking at it, Grant thought it was alarming because Cobain’s death took place somewhere between the 5th and 6th of April, and the activity of Cobain’s card continued on April 6th. Immediately, Grant informed the Seattle Police department. One of the officers said he was going to take care of the matter, talking to Seafirst Bank. The bank said that “they had only been able to identify when the information was logged onto their mainframe computer, and not specifically when the attempt was made or who it was made by“. It means that the activity in Kurt’s card is delayed, doesn’t show real-time transactions.

Tom Grant doesn’t believe in the bank statement. However, his scans of the transactions reveal the bank and police were right. Looking at the activities of Cobain’s card provided by Tom Grant, on the top line it

October 10, 2011




(KURT AND COURTNEY) INTERVIEW WITH NICK BROOMFIELD

interview with Nick about his thoughts on the movie Rivaling the tabloid documentaries of Nick Broomfield in the realm of boldness and imagination are personal, in-house motives which propel him into ever more raw, nervy and in your face moviemaking. Broomfield revealed to me in an intriguing two-way conversation how he casts himself in his own fantasy scenarios as the embodiment of the modern adventurer, in the tradition of guys like Jack London and Melville. But the go for broke director of Heidi Fleiss: Hollywood Madam and Aileen Wuornos: The Selling of A Serial Killer may have met his match, not to mention his white whale, with Kurt and Courtney. Cobain widow and rocker Courtney Love went on the offensive against Broomfield and nearly succeeded in shutting his showdown through her corporate influences in the rock world. Of course, this just added fuel to Broomfield’s creative mission, and he explained why.

PRAIRIE MILLER:

After going through the whole experience of making Kurt and Courtney, what is your personal take on the reasons behind Kurt Cobain’s death?

NICK BROOMFIELD:

 I think that he committed suicide. I don’t think that there’s a smoking gun. And I think there’s only one way you can explain a lot of things around his death. Not that he was murdered, but that there was just a lack of caring for him. I just think that Courtney had moved on, and he was expendable.

PM: Did the process of making this movie change any of your preconceived notions about either Kurt or Courtney?

NB: I fully expected Courtney to take part in the film, and to use it in a positive way to explain a lot of things that were being said about Kurt’s death. And I fully expected her to be very likeable and charismatic, in the same way for example that Heidi Fleiss was in my film about her. I was really astonished when Courtney tried to control the film. You know, with the BBC and MTV, and trying to block me from getting any of the music. I was really astonished and amazed. That gave a lot more credibility to some of the stories that people were saying about her. I thought a lot of the things that were being said were very extreme, but after a while, I came to believe them. And that was directly borne out of my own experiences in making this film. It was really like a diary. I didn’t go into this thinking anything negative at all about Courtney. It was actually made with a lot of reluctance. I mean, for me it would have been much more satisfying to make a film about someone whom I could say, all these bad things are being said, but she’s such a wonderful person. I didn’t get any satisfaction out of making what I believe to be a truthful, but very dark portrait of someone.

PM: Is she still harassing you in any way?

NB: No.

PM: She gave up?

NB: Yeah.

PM: And what about your preconceived notions related to Kurt Cobain?

NB: With him, it was probably the opposite. The people who were close to him were incredibly moved by him. And I think he was a very sensitive character who grew up under very difficult conditions. You know, he grew up in a logging town among big, tough loggers, and he was a very sensitive creature. He was an artist. He wrote poems and painted. He liked to play his guitar and didn’t fit in, and he frequently got beaten up. He didn’t really have a mother past the age of eight or nine and was shunted around between friends and relatives. You know, he was a lonely, unhappy child, and he really moved a lot of people. I think women wanted to mother him. I think there was a heart in him that really cried out for help, and women especially responded to that.

Filmmaker Nick Broomfield,


IᑎTEᖇᐯIEᗯ ᗷETᗯEEᑎ ᑎIᑕK & ᗪYᒪᗩᑎ ᑕᗩᖇᒪSOᑎ

In the film, Kurt and Courtney Nick Broomfield interviewed Dylan Carlson. His introduction to this interview is as follows:

“I found Dylan to be evasive and in a very defensive position. As Kurt’s best friend it was crazy for him to have bought the gun if he thought Kurt was suicidal. At the same time, he didn’t want to appear to be supporting Tom Grant’s murder theory…..”

Broomfield:

And what about his relationship with Courtney?

 Carlson:

Um, obviously it was going through turbulence, some turbulence. Whether it was going to end or not we don’t know. I don’t think we ever will, I mean, you know, but I mean all marriages go through their ups and downs.

Broomfield:

Did he ever say anything to you about, I mean, he did say it to plenty of other people…?

Carlson:

Said what?

Broomfield:

That he was going to finish the relationship.

Carlson:

Divorce? I mean, he never, he flat out said anything like that or any implication about it to me, you know. I mean, he didn’t even make any hints as far as I know about any kind of divorce or anything like that.

Broomfield:

I mean, it’s like, I’m just saying it’s like, why?…

I mean, if you are his best friend and he didn’t say anything about being depressed or suicidal, he just wanted the gun for prowlers, and that Rome was just an accident, you know, maybe you would think also he could have been murdered?

Carlson:

Mmm, why? I mean, who? I mean, it’s like…..

Broomfield:

Well if you were his best friend and he never said anything about anything being wrong, and he’d seen you just before- you know, maybe Tom Grant is right, maybe he was murdered.

Carlson:

But I mean he doesn’t have to say anything about it being wrong. I mean, it’s like, you know, when you are friends with someone there is like subtler forms of information transfer than just flat out, you know…

Broomfield:

So what did he subtly communicate to you?.

Carlson:

Broomfield:

I’m just trying to get a sense of what he did communicate to you. What you understood.

Carlson:

I mean, the thing is it’s like, the time he would have been communicating any sort of, you know, a sense that he wanted to kill himself was already….was when he came back from Exodus when I didn’t see him, you know.

Broomfield:

But if you bought the gun before he went and you think he was now suicidal.

.. Carlson:

I don’t think he was necessarily like planning to kill himself at that point necessarily, I mean, I don’t know though…I mean…

Broomfield:

It was just a coincidence.

Carlson:

I mean, it’s like if he had been totally like suicidal from the outset he would have used the gun that day probably, you know what I mean, why did he like try to go down and go through treatment?

Broomfield:

Why do you think?

Carlson:

You know, well ’cos there was all the fucking pressure on him to go through treatment. His wife is telling him he needs to go through treatment, his record company, his management, you know. So he goes and he tries to get off drugs and he can’t or he doesn’t want to. I mean it’s like basically, he doesn’t want to cos it’s like, you know, there is no reason for him to get off drugs. You know, it’s not like he’s poverty-stricken and robbing grocery stores to supply his habit.

Broomfield:

But how was Courtney telling him to be off drugs when she was on them anyway?

Carlson:

I dunno, ’cos she was the one who was all gung-ho for him to quit. I mean, they were both constantly like, I mean, trying to hide it from one another. I mean, the most ridiculous example was one time Kurt called me up to get some speed and then the other line rang and I answered the other line and it was Courtney asking me to get her dope, and both of them were like, “Oh, don’t let the other one know (smiles), I mean.

. Broomfield:

I don’t know what I think about the whole murder conspiracy.

Carlson:


Put it this way, if I seriously thought Kurt had been murdered, the people… if I thought Courtney was involved or if I thought, they would be dead now, flat out( small laugh.) I would kill them. If I thought that was the case, I mean,…

Broomfield:

But don’t you think it’s curious that if Courtney, as you said, loved Kurt so much, and she was really so worried about him, she knew he had a gun and thought he was suicidal. That she didn’t come up to Seattle to look for him? At this point, Carlson looks thoughtful but says nothing.

Dylan Carlson Kurt’s “best friend “Evidence ???Shotgun, drugs, best friend. Murder? Gun receipt Shotgun purchased in Dylan’s name


𝐸𝓁 𝒹𝓊𝒸𝒽𝑒’𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝒾𝑒𝓌https://www.youtube.com/embed/2x4jmX6yoTs?wmode=transparent

Filmmaker Nick Broomfield,

Nick & El Duce

Nick Broomfield, deciding to investigate the theories himself, brought a film crew to visit a number of people associated with both Cobain and Love, including Love’s estranged father, Cobain’s aunt, and one of the couples’ former nannies Mentors’ bandleader Eldon “El Duce” Hoke, who claimed that Love had offered him $50,000 to kill Cobain.

Although Hoke claimed that he knew who killed Cobain, he did not mention a name and offered no evidence to support his assertion. However, he mentioned speaking to someone called “Allen” (Allen Wrench), before quickly interjecting, “I mean, my friend”, then laughing, “I’ll let the FBI catch him.”

Broomfield incidentally captured Hoke’s final interview, as he died days later when he was struck by a train in the middle of the night. Although El Duce passed a lie detector test no action was taken & his death was ruled an accident. https://www.youtube.com/embed/QRlxE03c5Rk?wmode=transparent


.


podcast about Kurts death

TᕼE ᑕOᗷᗩIᑎᑕᗩᔕEhttps://www.youtube.com/embed/VAkCi9l3lxU?wmode=transparenthttps://www.youtube.com/embed/uQNetKLvEHg?wmode=transparent

Cali spoke with Kurt

JESSICA HOOPER .

https://thedemoniacal.blogspot.com/

1 thought on “Evidence

  1. Pingback: Evidence – cobainfiles&collection

Comments are closed.